Pediatric Rehabilitation (Session 2)-Pediatric Rehabilitation (Session 2)

Video Transcription

Video Summary

The video discusses a non-inferiority cluster randomized crossover study on telephysiatry versus in-person physiatry care for children with special healthcare needs. The study aims to compare patient experience, perceived quality of care, and economic benefits between the two modes of care. Though there was initial resistance, both parents and therapists expressed high satisfaction with telephysiatry, and no significant differences in satisfaction were found. Telephysiatry resulted in cost savings for families and the CCS program by reducing travel costs, missed work, and physician travel expenses. The study demonstrates that telephysiatry can provide high-quality care, increased access, cost savings, and improved patient outcomes.<br /><br />The panelists in the video discuss advancements in pediatric rehabilitation, including telemedicine, documentation, and virtual technology. They address the challenges posed by COVID-19 and stress the importance of research, advocacy, collaboration, and education to enhance patient outcomes and access to care. They mention initiatives like the Pediatric Rehabilitation Virtual Lecture Series, Journal Club, virtual fellowship fairs, and support for the Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine. They encourage viewers to get involved, donate to the Dr. Molnar Fund and the Foundation for PM&R, and stay updated on upcoming events. The panelists emphasize the need for collaboration and advocacy to improve the quality of care for children with disabilities.

Keywords

telephysiatry

in-person physiatry care

children with special healthcare needs

satisfaction

cost savings

access to care

pediatric rehabilitation

telemedicine

COVID-19

research

advocacy

collaboration

disabilities